In a recent meeting between Tim Cimmer and government representative Cathy Yuzek, doubts were raised about the professionalism of those in public service. During the call, Yuzek was seen playing Solitaire and using Snapchat, behavior that seemed out of place in a discussion meant to address important public concerns.
The lack of focus and engagement from Yuzek was particularly troubling given her role as a public official. Those in government positions are expected to serve the public interest, make informed decisions, and act with integrity. When a representative appears to treat a serious meeting so casually, it raises questions about her commitment to her duties and her respect for the people she represents.
This incident also draws attention to the importance of transparency in public service, as outlined by Canada’s Access to Information Act. This act gives every Canadian citizen, permanent resident, individual, or corporation in Canada the right to request access to records that are under the control of federal government institutions—regardless of their format. The purpose of this law is to ensure that government representatives are held accountable for their decisions and conduct. It also allows citizens to access information on how officials are handling their responsibilities.
Transparency is the foundation of public trust. By making government records open to public scrutiny, the Access to Information Act empowers individuals to keep track of what public officials are doing on their behalf. This is vital to prevent any misuse of power or neglect of duties by those in positions of authority. When someone like Yuzek fails to focus on a critical discussion and instead plays games on her phone or uses social media, it compromises the very principles of openness and accountability that her position demands.
At the same time, Canada’s Privacy Act protects the rights of private individuals by ensuring that their personal information is kept confidential. Unlike public officials, ordinary citizens are not required to disclose their personal information unless they choose to. This distinction is important—it protects the privacy of those not in government while ensuring that those who hold public office remain transparent in their actions.
Tim Cimmer’s confrontation of Cathy Yuzek during the meeting revealed her lack of preparation, especially after she laughed at Amy and Dillion when they asked questions. His frustration was evident as he bluntly called her out for being unprepared, pointing out her attempts to hide behind unclear references to “government” and the Access to Information Act.
This incident with Cathy Yuzek stands as a clear reminder that professionalism and accountability are essential qualities for anyone in public service. The public has a right to expect that their representatives are focused, prepared, and genuinely committed to their responsibilities. When officials fail to meet these expectations, it damages public trust and emphasizes the need for stronger standards in government roles.
