In a decisive move to safeguard national security, President Donald Trump has signed a memorandum directing the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to impose stricter controls on Chinese investments in critical American industries. This action aims to prevent foreign adversaries, particularly China, from leveraging U.S. capital and technology to enhance their military and intelligence capabilities.
The memorandum outlines the administration’s intent to establish new regulations ensuring that only foreign investments aligning with American interests are permitted. Additionally, it signals potential restrictions on outbound U.S. investments to China in sensitive sectors such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence, quantum computing, biotechnology, and aerospace. These measures reflect a broader strategy to curb China’s access to technologies that could pose security threats to the United States.
This directive builds upon previous efforts to reshape global trade relations and protect U.S. industries from foreign interference. Notably, the administration has considered tariffs on countries imposing digital services taxes affecting American tech firms, aiming to shield U.S. companies from anti-competitive foreign policies.
The impact of CFIUS interventions is evident in cases like AppLovin, a U.S. tech company. In 2016, a proposed $1.4 billion sale to China’s Orient Hontai Capital was blocked due to national security concerns. This led AppLovin to restructure and eventually achieve significant growth, highlighting the profound influence of CFIUS on business trajectories.
The administration’s actions have already led to a significant decline in Chinese investments in the U.S., dropping from $46 billion in 2016 to less than $5 billion in 2022. These measures underscore a commitment to protecting critical sectors, including agriculture, minerals, and technology, from potential foreign exploitation
China has criticized these steps, urging the U.S. to avoid politicizing economic issues and warning of potential retaliatory measures to defend its interests. As the situation develops, the global economic landscape may experience heightened tensions between the two superpowers.